dinsdag 5 november 2013

The One Thing I Would Change as the CEO of Moz

Posted by wilreynolds


What many of you might not know is that this CEO Swap scared me. It didn’t scare me because I would have a hard time letting go, and not because I would be allowing Rand to view every little thing about my life with no filter by managing my inbox and experiencing everything that I experience everyday. What scared me the most was that I wouldn’t add value to Moz. Let’s be honest: Moz is two times the size of SEER, has more money in the bank, and has more senior leadership. So I was scared that I would learn so much personally and would contribute very little back to the team, and I went to bed every single night worried about it.


My belief about worry is this: If you are concerned for one reason or another and can do something about it, stop worrying and start WORKING. If you can’t do anything about it, let it go! Based on this belief, during the CEO swap I started working every night to build something of value for Moz; something that could help Rand make as many millionaires in Seattle as possible.


Every night when I got home, I sketched out what I learned that day and how it might help Moz achieve their organizational goals. To me, Moz Analytics seemed to be the biggest bet that they were making, but I wasn’t sold, so I asked myself: Why not be sold? To be honest, we don’t use it very much at SEER. Instead, we use Open Site Explorer and its toolbar like mad; Moz Analytics is rarely used. I decided that if this was Moz’s big bet, I wanted to help them to win it.



I took an in-depth look into Moz’s goals and core values and made a pitch to Rand that I thought would fit. I started with the problems below:


Problem #1: We get rankings from Google in a way that they don’t like very much, which to me is risky. I feel that the industry would be forced to steer clear of keywords as the major KPI and that rankings will still be important when it comes to direction, but not so much in a functional manner when it comes to day-to-day impact.


Problem #2: The “big bet” on Moz Analytics integrates very nicely with Google Analytics, but kicking the hornet’s nest on rankings was a problem. A big problem. Betting on analytics is the future while betting on rankings is the past, and we’re risking this analytics relationship so that we can focus on the way SEO was done in the past.


Problem #3 – Rand hardly ever talks about tracking rankings anymore, at least not in a positive light. He’s been placing the concept of inbound and content marketing as a theme in every slide deck he creates. I literally went through about 10 of his decks and tried to find him speaking about a positive side of rankings. While it might get a mention here or there, not a single one of his decks are themed around the critical nature of rankings.


Problem #4: Both Rand and Dr. Pete believe that social metrics have a pretty strong correlation to rankings.



So that we can address these problems appropriately, it’s best to develop an understanding of Moz’s mission:



Moz is all about better marketing and not just better rankings. One of their initiatives is to reach a marketing audience that’s a bit more broad:



Rand’s presentations even talk about how having a high ranking doesn’t always mean maximum traffic:



He says it again:



And again:



I have many more examples, but i’m sure you get the point by now. Rand doesn’t believe that our jobs are all about rankings. He knows it and presents that philosophy everywhere he speaks. So why does Moz believe that rankings have to be provided? Let’s start trying to answer that question by taking a look at true love.



Rand likes to talk about building true love with your community:



Even Roger realizes the power of community and true love:



Every day, Rand inspires an entire industry to level-up, to become strong content marketers, and to make their audiences fall in love with them. Yet, Roger goes around the web looking for “rankings”?


Each night I went home (to Rand’s home, that is) and I presented a personal challenge by asking myself: If Rand’s True Love is great marketing (which is a distant second to Geraldine), then why doesn’t Roger tell me when my competitors are starting to achieve “True Love” with their audiences? We both want to help marketers, and I feel that with the tools that Roger has and the team behind him, that he can be deployed in many new ways.


Both Rand and I want to see the industry level-up and we don’t talk about rankings often. This is because we realize that:





And then, eureka! It hit me. More people care about competitors than they do about rankings. A small number of businesses care about rankings, but almost every business wants to know what their competition is up to.


Roger is focused on my analytics and my rankings, and as we have seen, Google has started to meld these things together. This is exactly where I see a major risk to Moz. During one of my meetings at Moz, I got a much-needed reminder from Adam, Moz’s Chief Product Officer on the E-team, that we have to add value over what Google can provide. And it was a GREAT reminder.


The fear within this is that right now I can get:


Adwords + Rankings in Google Analytics


Adwords + Natural Search in Google Webmaster Tools


Rankings in Google Webmaster Tools


In my eyes, the big threat to Moz, to Roger, and to the amazing people I met that week is that Google is bringing together its own data in ways they never did before.



So I decided, what if Roger took a stand and went to a place that Google will NEVER go? I’m talking competitive analysis. Google barely wants to give us our own rankings, much less the rankings of a competitor. (See? I still believe that rankings have a role, just that they shouldn’t be a KPI.)


I believe that more people care about competitors than they do about rankings. To this point, I haven’t checked SEER’s rankings in months, but I check on my competitors regularly.


There are so many businesses out there; hotels, the creators of tablets, potato chip companies, food distributors, and they all have something in common. They all have competitors, and they all want to know what these competitors are doing on the web.


And I think Roger can help with that and it also connects to one of Moz’s goals:



Google’s “True Love” lies within the attempt to rank great content, and it always has been. They might not be able to rank this content well in every instance just yet, but they are working on it:



Think about what happens when your competitor goes and sees this guy at a conference.



After the conference, they decide to change their ways and to work at becoming better marketers who think more broadly about the role of search in marketing. They start to become content marketers, inbound marketers, email marketers, all in addition to already being SEOs. They start working their tails off and their rankings start moving from 50, to 45, to 30, to 17, to 7, and so on.



Roger isn’t so smart (not yet anyway, but some people are working on this. Shh, it’s a secret.) He has the capability, but he isn’t smart enough to find the competitors that you might want to track that are growing their community and their links, producing videos, content, whitepapers, and a whole host more. The issue with what we consider to be “typical” competitor tracking is that we all take a look, see who is ranking highly, and put them into the competitor box.



Roger isn’t saying, “Hey! Someone you ignored for years isn’t on the content marketing bandwagon just yet, but they are building community. So get on it!” When he should be saying just that.


Think of it Scooby Doo-style. ROGER, where are you?


Roger, where are you to warn me when I need you to that someone just read everything that Rand has written over the past three years, has started implementing it, and is moving on. See, Roger, I need your help because by the time I even get the hint that someone is taking me over, it’s too late. What am I supposed to do when they are producing five times more content than me, have grown their community ten times, and 25% of major influencers are following them on Twitter, while I only have a mere 5%?


By then, it’s too late for me to do anything about it. So help me out, Roger. You need to show me not only the people who are ranking in the top spot right now, but those that will be later so I can catch them before it’s too late. I need to know who is developing content that might be relevant to my audience AS they are developing it.


You can do this, Roger. What about your own Followerwonk? You show me a Venn diagram with overlap in audiences. Here I look at SEER and SEOGadget’s common audience- wouldn’t it be great to let me know when their content is getting more shares from our overlapping audiences, with a little Topsy magic?



It all comes down to what both Rand I believe in:



Cyrus Said it:



Rand said it:



Zappos didn’t become Zappos by doing everything for rankings. Instead they cared about their customers, and now they dominate rankings because they combined love for their customers and a love of rankings. Right now I have a client that is dominating their space in a similar way in that their competitors never saw them coming. They climbed from 50, to 40, to 33, to 27, to 15, to 6 in the rankings for major terms, and by then it was too late for their competitors to catch up. Now they are on top of the rankings for thousands of keywords, and their competitors are just beginning to do what they’ve been doing for years.



Could Roger have helped competitors to see us coming?

Can he help me to see the next competitor coming before it’s too late?


Over time, could the correlations above take the place of “rank tracking from a directional sense?” This would help to minimize the strain that Google has with scraping, which is a major risk.


When it comes to specific types of content like videos, I want Roger to tell me when a competitor (tracked or untracked) produces 10 videos that are receiving engagement on a topic relevant to a brand and/or keyword that I am targeting. Ultimately, that competitor knows that video content is a long game, and therefore they are in it for just that, which will eventually reward them with rankings. So naturally I want to know about it.


I don’t care about my rankings. Instead, I care when a competitor is producing more content, getting more visibility with influencers (social authority) to their content, and growing community.





  • “Wil, I’ll tell you when the industry is getting hot with content from competitors named and unnamed (big thanks to David Weiser, Tom McElroy, and Shawn Edwards). I’ll watch your back. I’ll catch people who are creating great content well before they start to outrank you and hurt your business. Moz is all about great content, so we can even point you to Moz blog posts that can help you fight back.”






  • “Wil, your competitor was followed by an influencer with high social authority. I saw it with Followerwonk. That’s ten in the last three months! Eventually, with this growing community of influencers sharing their content, they will outrank you, get more press, more branded search, and beat you in rankings.”




  • “Influencers are tweeting their content seven times more than yours.” (Shout out to Matt Peters for helping me realize this was possible.)




  • “The new Thai joint that opened 5 months ago is still getting rave reviews and at a faster pace than you are. Eventually this will lead to (unless they are fake, of course) them getting: more customers + higher rankings = MONEY!”




  • “Wil, I’ll tell you when videos are going to show up, and if my named competitors are producing that video on critical keywords.”




  • “I got your back, Wil. I’ll monitor the velocity in your competitors’ Linkedin, YouTube, local reviews, Slideshare, blogs, and more. I’ll keep an eye out anywhere they are producing great content, and if that velocity of content marketing is greater than yours, I’ll point you to our content, slideshare, video, or whatever I can that can help you keep from getting beat.”




In this scenario, Roger’s got me covered so that no company can come out of the blue and take rankings. Roger also knows that great content often drives conversions and not just rankings, so as such, this will also alert you to when your competitor might be getting more conversions from great content marketing.



I know that something like this will take time, but with the many things that I saw on the back end of Moz’s business, I know that people are already working on a lot of these things in many different ways.


Going back a little bit to my first day and first meeting at the Moz offices, I was in a (not provided) discussion. I was joined by Senior Product Manager Miranda, Dr. Pete, Adam, and a few others. The objective was simple in that parts of the Moz toolset would show zeros and (–)’s given that keywords were no longer provided.


I listened for the first part of the meeting and then started to ask questions. A big one was if people really use keyword rankings as a major KPI. As SEER expects to no longer have rankings be a major KPI by the end of 2014, we believe our work can have a much larger impact while also boosting rankings.


So to the Moz community, employees, and leadership, the CEO swap pushed me to develop something for you that could at least spark internal conversations at Moz, and I hope this write-up does. Rand inspires me to do great content marketing, get better at building community, and be better to my customers. He inspires me to find True Love. This may very well be on your roadmap, so maybe all I am doing is validating what you already know, but Roger needs a “True Love” meter for me and my competitors both named and unnamed. We all know that the time is now. Every single day, Google is integrating more and more data from their tools, which does present a threat. But Google jumping into the competitive tool business is highly unlikely, so maybe the team at Moz can get there first.


–Wil Reynolds

CEO

Moz


Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!



via Moz Blog http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MozBlog/~3/HeSmgX2ep18/the-one-thing-i-would-change-as-the-ceo-of-moz


http://seocompanyadvice.com/the-one-thing-i-would-change-as-the-ceo-of-moz/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-one-thing-i-would-change-as-the-ceo-of-moz

maandag 4 november 2013

Please help me run the Boston Marathon

On April 21st, 2014, I’m going to run the Boston Marathon. If you want to show your support, please donate to a good cause for cancer research. Anyone who wants to give is welcome. :)


So many people have been affected by cancer, including members of my own family. The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute funds basic and innovative cancer research. That’s why I’m trying to raise $9,000 for the Dana-Farber Marathon Challenge.


Matt Cutts in the San Francisco marathon

I’ve been running for a few years now (that’s me at the San Francisco marathon), but this is the first time I’m trying to run to raise money for a cause, and I would really appreciate donations. It won’t give you more PageRank or a higher rank on Google, but Dana-Farber is a great institution and I’d love to raise as much money for them as I can before I run in Boston. If you can, please consider donating to kick cancer’s butt. Thank you!


via Matt Cutts: Gadgets, Google, and SEO http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/boston-marathon-charity-fundraising/


http://seocompanyadvice.com/please-help-me-run-the-boston-marathon/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=please-help-me-run-the-boston-marathon

Be the Result that Google Wants to Rank

Posted by Kristina Kledzik


As SEOs, we’re the only type of online marketers who pay little to no attention to the people who actually visit our websites. PPC’ers watch visitors’ responses to ads via click through rates, social media managers converse with users directly, writers write for readers, and designers design for visitors. But SEOs give advice based on Google.


Google, like the rest of online marketers, is primarily concerned with the opinions of visitors to Google.com. Its goals is to deliver the most satisfying webpages as results to searchers (and possibly charge for those results through ever-more-subtle paid ads). Thus, we SEOs eventually have our effect on actual visitors, as our techniques to attract search engines allow our sites to rank well and get visits from actual humans.


Why don’t we just make changes for visitors so that Google will want to rank us well?


In the dawn of SEO, Google was stupid


When Google was first created, it couldn’t see nearly as much as it can now, and focusing on user experience alone could leave your site virtually unreadable to Google. I only started in this industry in 2010, and even then, SEOs had to focus on specific keyword usage, tagging, link building, and anchor text—all things that are virtually meaningless to visitors. But over the past few years, Google’s near-daily algorithm updates have made its crawler interpret webpages more and more like a human would.


Still, we continue to panic about every change Google makes. What are their next steps? Are they going to do something that will crush your site?


Here’s a hint: If we’re optimizing our sites for visitors, there’s little to no chance that a Google algorithm update will penalize us. That means that we’re on Google’s side: We’re trying to make our site better for visitors, which makes Google look good when visitors click through to our sites. Help them help us.



The good news is, if you’re a white hat SEO who keeps up on search engine trends, Google has probably led you into doing some good online marketing without even realizing it. To explain this a little more clearly, here’s a comparison of some of the top white-hat SEO strategies from 2010, when I started, and how you should handle them in 2013:


On-page keyword usage → content strategy


2010: The best way to rank #1 for a keyword was to use it in the <title>, the <h1>, maybe an <h2>, and a few times in the text (but no keyword stuffing! Google had figured that out, at least.)


2013: Google understands synonyms now, so you can use a keyword once and show that it’s highly relevant with other similar terms. Experts recommend using keyword groups (an idea that I had been hinting at for ages but didn’t think of concretely until I read Cyrus’s awesome post): Use a number of keywords that all mean approximately the same thing, so you can be relevant for all of them.


How to be even better with content strategy


Don’t focus so much on keywords with the most local searches a month, on average (Google Keyword Planner is so vague). Instead, use phrases that your current and potential customers use.


There are hundreds of easy, reliable, cheap online survey tools, so take your pick. Reach out to your email list and ask them to complete a survey that asks:



  • How they describe your products/services

  • What emotions they attribute to your products/services

  • Why they want/need your products/services

  • The ideal brand personality that would sell your products/services


Allow survey takers to write in the responses free-form, so they won’t be restricted to the words you think they’ll use.


Once you have the right keywords, work them into the copy in a way that speaks to them. This will take a great content strategy, something that I can’t describe to you briefly here. But these blog posts will get you on the right path:


How to Build a Content Marketing Strategy


Kill it in Content Creation by Knowing Your Customer Conversion Funnel


Avoiding Disaster: How to Prevent the 3 Most Common Content Marketing #Fails


On-page structure/tagging → design


2010: You had to mark up the important parts of a webpage with HTML tags: <h#>, <strong>, and <em>.


2013: Google can see where text will show up on a page, and how prominent it will be to visitors. You can’t just tag text to make it relevant to search engines, it has to be integrated into the design.


Design isn’t just a “nice to have.” It’s a necessary part of the online marketing world now, and it absolutely pays off. If you didn’t come to MozCon 2012, Jenny Lam’s presentation discusses how people are much more likely to trust attractive things. Google knows that design builds trust: Remember how Panda slapped websites covered in ads? As Google begins to understand how people interpret design better and better, having a good design will become a necessary part of both online marketing and SEO.


How to be even better with good design


PAY FOR GOOD DESIGN.


Many of you reading this blog are technical, possibly able to build a very solid HTML website. That does not make you a good web designer.


Go out there and find a good web designer. Your input will be to remind the designer you hired that good web design does include a lot of text, both for search engines and for visitors.


Resources:


9 Principles for Great Branding by Design


Designing for SEO


Link building → online public relations


2010: Google was already getting pretty good at devaluing links from crappy sites, but a good link network could still work, and it certainly hadn’t started penalizing you yet!


2013: Many sites have gone down because of Penguin alone, and others are still reeling from it. We can’t buy links anymore, yet almost all bloggers understand the value of a link and want to be paid for it.


At Distilled, we now do what we like to call “online PR,” where we focus on building relationships with bloggers and sites. The important thing is to focus on building a partnership where they rely on us as much as we rely on them. With a one-sided relationship, site owners are bound to take your link down or forget about you eventually, but when they look to you as a source of knowledge, and valuable to their readers, they’ll keep reaching out to you.


And that’s very much like—gasp—real PR!


How to get better with online PR


Don’t look for a link with DA [blank]. Look for a site that is genuinely a good match for what you or your client has to offer. Pitch the link or mention to the other site the way you would explain it if you weren’t you and just thought it was a good match. Be flexible, so you can build a long-term relationship and keep sharing things through that channel in the future.


Here are a few great resources to point you in the right direction for great outreach:


The Blogger Outreach Equation


8 Tips for Blogger Outreach


Why Link Building Strategies Fail


Anchor text manipulation → branding


2010: The strongest way to rank for a keyword was to get a link with that keyword in the anchor text. Ecommerce sites across the nation paid for links with their target keyword in it and slipped those links in unrelated articles.


2013: It occurred to Google that if you have a million links to your site for “slinkies” but no links to your site about your brand name, no one knew who you were. There’s just too much information out there, and too many scams. People feel more comfortable with brands, and are more likely to click on links to recognizable brands.


At the same time, Google realized that link profiles full of unbranded links were probably paid for, and that contributed to penalties.


Now, it’s better to focus on brand awareness than the specific anchor text to your page. The more people are talking about your brand, the more likely they’ll be to search for you specifically, and then you won’t even have to worry about competing for #1 position in SERPs, you’ll just be there!


How to get better with more brand awareness and loyalty


I think we’ve always known the value of branding. After all, why do so many Americans pay $2.50 for $0.05 worth of water, carbonation, sugar, and a bit of caffeine?


It’s just been easier to match your content with search terms than to get people to actually search for you. Building brand awareness and loyalty involves building relationships with people you don’t know yet, which is absolutely terrifying. It means you can try your hardest but fail, and have no idea why.


But, let’s look at this a different way. Competing in the world of online marketing without a brand means that you’re relying 100% on Google to continue to send you visitors. This is a very one-sided relationship. If Google changes things, or if your competitors get slightly better and edge you out of the first page of results, your business will collapse completely, and Google won’t even notice. No company should rely so heavily on another, especially not one that barely knows you exist. Building a brand is planning for the future, and protecting you against the whims of Google.


Instead, make your company into something you’re excited about, so it can excite your customers too. Put as much money into building your brand as you do other online marketing activities; it’ll pay off. Joanna Lord gave one of the best “how to” speeches on building brand loyalty at SearchLove this year: slideshare or video.


So, all this means SEO is dead, right?


NO.


For one thing, as smart as Google will get, it will always have its quirks, so technical SEO is here to stay.


For another, a big part of SEO is identifying and understanding your competitors for certain search terms, since that can be very different from your competitors in real life.


But, SEO alone can’t make your business. Even if, for some reason, it does right now, it won’t in the future. SEO is one aspect of good online marketing, but you have to be a great marketer overall to make it in the long run.


Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!



via Moz Blog http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MozBlog/~3/Vqt60RE1Omk/be-the-result-that-google-wants-to-rank


http://seocompanyadvice.com/be-the-result-that-google-wants-to-rank/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=be-the-result-that-google-wants-to-rank

vrijdag 1 november 2013

18 Speakers, Two Days…One SearchLove

The Brewery_crop


Now that the excitement of SearchLove London is behind us, we thought we’d console ourselves with a few of our favourite stories and snippets from the action-packed two days.


It was wonderful to see attendees from across Europe and beyond fill The Brewery, all eager to hear about the most advanced ideas and strategies driving online marketing today. Indeed, a flurry of messages in different languages landed in our Twitter feed as Duncan welcomed the first speaker.



Marco Montemagno_crop

Marco Montemagno – 15 Years Of Unconventional Marketing



As the lights dimmed, Marco Montemagno ran onto stage to fill the room with his boundless energy and tales of unconventional marketing. How do you create a buzz around a business with little or no budget? Through partnering up with others. As founding organiser of Social Media Week, Marco created excitement around the Rome event by partnering up with high speed train company, Frecciarossa. One thousand journalists and bloggers were transported to the Italian capital in style, creating plenty of press before the event had even begun.


Amelia Showalter

Amelia Showalter – What Drives Action Online? Lessons from the Frontline of Testing’



Amelia Showalter then gave us an eye-opening look into the workings of a presidential campaign. Having acted as Director of Digital Analytics for Obama’s re-election, Amelia performed extensive A/B testing of emails. The result? Mild cursing in subject lines, ugly highlighting and casual talk all returned good results – defying many of the team’s previous assumptions. In turn, Amelia encouraged the SearchLove audience to foster a culture of testing. It seems we shouldn’t trust our gut!


Simon Penson

Simon Penson – The New Rules of Big Content Promotion



Next up, Simon Penson shed light on the new rules of big content promotion. Okay, you’ve created something great, but how do you maximise its reach? As Simon persuasively argued, it’s about people, not email accounts. You must get to know your audience, find out what niches they sit within. One way of identifying key sites for your content is using PReacher, a tool created by Simon and his company Zazzle Media.


Aleyda Solis

Aleyda Solis – From unknown foreigner to local star



The SearchLove audience was guided around the big wide world of International SEO by Aleyda Solis. Talking us through the various aspects of consideration, Aleyda explained that translation is not only about language but understanding the subtleties of each country’s specific dialect and set of cultural codes. A story about cheese illustrated this beautifully. Food-producer Saputo wanted to expand the sales of its feta cheese into the Spanish-speaking market, yet its name ‘Fetos’ translates into ‘fetus’ – a rebrand was definitely needed! For help with understanding your international audience’s behaviour, check out the Consumer Barometer.


Wil Reynolds

Wil Reynolds – Google Approved Paid Links?



Next up, Wil Reynolds shared his experiences with using Google-approved paid links. His hair-raising story began with giving a freshman $10k ‘play money’ with the objective of getting eyeballs on content. Across a series of tests, Wil accepted that failures were part and parcel of the process (he jokingly referred to this as ‘burning money’). However, once the gruelling research was over, he discovered how to make a high return from little investment.


Abby Covert

Abby Covert — ‘Lessons From An Ontology Nerd’



Abby Covert then demonstrated the many intricacies of ontology. It seems that meaning is a tricky beast – this being highly subjective and shaped within socio political parameters. Demonstrating the importance of ontological considerations, Abby gave the example of a company using images of white lanterns across different countries. In America white lanterns were commonly used for decoration at weddings, while in China they symbolised mourning. Ontology expert please!


Craig Bradford

Craig Bradford — ‘Learn To Leverage The 99% That Aren’t Customers’



Next, Distilled’s Craig Bradford encouraged businesses to find value in the customers they already have, rather than trying to find new ones. Indeed, Craig urged the adoption of a whole new mindset: focus on the customer, not the sale. Universal Analytics allows you to do this pretty easily by tracking the user not the session, potentially showing a conversion rate of 100% rather than, say, 33% as split across three devices.


Stacy Kavanagh

Stacy Kavanagh – 36 Tricks, Tips and Tools For Baiting Brand Signals Through Content’



Stacey Cavanagh owned the stage as she outlined many of the ways to bait brand signals through content. Surveys can often make lots of noise, especially if they tell an interesting story. For instance, Stacey launched an opinion poll which asked Americans to name UK cities other than London. When ‘Wales’ and ‘Paris’ were found among the top results, a newsworthy piece was born. Use this discount code and enjoy $75 off your next Google Consumer Survey.


Will Critchlow and TA

Tom Anthony & Will Critchlow — ‘The Future for Search’



Day one ended with a bang when Tom Anthony and Will Critchlow got up on stage for a SearchLove double-act. Considering many aspects of the future of search, Tom and Will talked through the shift in Google from indexing to understanding. A search for ‘Usain Bolt’, for example, returns relevant information including his height and weight. Meanwhile, typing ‘Eileen Collins’ skips talk of the astronaut’s measurements and, instead, reveals a history of her space mission and suchlike information. Google is, thus, more able to understand what kind of information the user is interested in.


Danny Scheinmann

Danny Scheinmann — ‘Telling Stories’



Following Monday night’s SearchLove party, Danny Scheinmann was the perfect antidote to any fuzzy heads. Putting theory into practice, Danny demonstrated the power of storytelling to capture the imagination of an audience. Indeed, the SearchLove audience was in the palm of his hand as Danny explained the phenomenal success of John Lewis’ Christmas advert; rather than showing any products or merchandise, the TV ad captured viewers with a simple love story between two lonely snowmen.


Nathalie Nahai

Nathalie Nahai — ‘Culturability: Are You Alienating Half Your Audience?’



Nathalie Nahai delved into the fascinating world of web psychology. How can you be persuasive online? Well, through understanding and taking control of the many psychological signals that shape how people think. Being sensitive to a particular culture forms a key dimension. Nathalie, for example, highlighted the distinction between long term- and short term-oriented cultures. While the former values things such as free materials and non time-critical content, the latter likes more instant gratification such as same-day delivery and ‘buy now’ functions.


Kelvin Newmann

Kelvin Newman — ‘Graph Theory: The Most Important Theory In Search That No One Talks About’



Making maths considerably less scary, Kelvin Newman explained the significance of Graph Theory for search in simple terms. He argued that Facebook’s Graph Search could be the next big thing on the internet, potentially becoming more powerful than Google. For, according to Kelvin, search isn’t about keywords anymore, it’s about entities. Facebook recognises the relationships between things – a huge advancement for the way we find results.


Bridget

Bridget Randolph — ‘So, You Have A Mobile Friendly Website, What Now?’



Distilled’s Bridget Randolph set us all frantically scribbling notes as she described the steps needed to devise a comprehensive mobile strategy. This all anchored around the question: How can I anticipate and fulfill my users’ needs? Bridget brought the subject to life with examples by brands such as Red Bull. The energy drinks company used Twitter to search for the word ‘exams’ and ‘mid-terms’; it then sent people a care package of Red Bull and ran a Tumblr where recipients could share ‘thank you’ photos.


Mark Borkowski

Mark Borkowski — ‘Savage creatures and vile passions; the lessons of communication by contagion’



Mark Borkowski gave a highly thought-provoking talk which explored the history of power and persuasion in the media. He argued that today’s digital landscape requires a reinvention of PR around collaborative conversations that afford the story more global reach. This calls for harnessing the power of the crowd, but how do you effectively motivate people? Sharing one of his own publicity stunts, Mark told us how he once invented a tap-dancing dog. After much attention from the press, he ‘killed it off’ with a story of a road accident in Stratford which, after a local outcry, persuaded the council to bring in a one-way system.


Chris Bennett

Chris Bennett — ‘How To Win Fans And Influence Users’



Answering many crucial questions, Chris Bennett explained how to create big content strategies that go the distance. For one thing, it’s about re-purposing content across different platforms. Chris showed us how he launched a piece on the 11 coolest companies to work for in Seattle, inspiring the chosen few to share the results on social media. He then re-launched the same piece in other American cities, and further expanded its reach by letting companies know they were in the running for the prize and devising plans for an award ceremony.


Paul Madden

Paul Madden — ‘Goodbye Spam, Hello Data!’



Next up, Paul Madden bid farewell to spam and said hello to data, giving a personal account of his realisation that he needed a change of approach. Sharing a quote from his grade 11 teacher, “Paul is easily influenced by his peers”, served as an honest insight into his susceptibility to follow the crowd. However, with changes in Google in 2012, Paul energetically went about adopting a new data-focussed approach in his career as an SEO.


PeppLaja

Peep Laja — ‘5 Steps To Persuasive Web Design’



Peep Laja asked: How do you persuade someone to buy your product without using words? Design can be enormously powerful – in fact, 94% of a viewer’s first impression of a website is based on how it looks. Peep talked us through a range of effective ways to increase visual engagement. Photographs play an important role, as does breaking up long chunks of text into three or four line paragraphs with plenty of subheadings.


Will Critchlow

Will Critchlow — ‘Making Your Mark Online: Local Business Edition’



Leaving the audience on a high, Will Critchlow was the final speaker to take to the SearchLove stage. Will championed the potential for small businesses to do great things with their marketing. For, unlike the bigger players, small businesses often benefit from having a passionate and agile team. The success of Hawksmoor served as a great example; the East London restaurant owner walked around to neighbouring businesses to introduce himself, fostering a trust and personal connection with people. Will also highlighted Twitter as a way in which the restaurant engages in one-to-one conversations with its customers in order to built a great reputation.


Finally, we’d like to say a massive thank you to everyone who attended. Were you there? Don’t forget to leave your feedback of the event.


via distilled » Blog http://www.distilled.net/blog/marketing/18-speakers-two-days-one-searchlove/


http://seocompanyadvice.com/18-speakers-two-daysone-searchlove/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=18-speakers-two-daysone-searchlove

Using Google+ to Appear in the Top Results Every Time – Whiteboard Friday

Posted by randfish


Many marketers are wondering about the effects of Google+ on search results, and for anyone with a Google+ profile, a few personalized searches make those effects quite apparent. In today’s Whiteboard Friday, Marshall Lee the vampire king (don’t be afraid, it’s just Rand) explains how having the right circlers on Google+ can lead to top-ranked results for even the broadest of queries in their SERPs.






























In case you’re unfamiliar, Rand is Marshall Lee the Vampire King.


For reference, here’s a still of this week’s whiteboard:



Video transcription


Howdy, Moz fans, and welcome to a spooooky Halloween edition of Whiteboard Friday! I’m wearing some fangs this week, so if you have some trouble understanding me, don’t worry, all the text is right down there below.


I wanted to talk a little about using Google+ to appear in Google’s top results. It’s really interesting what we’ve been observing over the last few weeks and months of Google’s development, so check this out. If I do a search for “data science,” and I’m logged into my Google+ account (which is “randfish,” right—randfish@gmail), I see under data science “How Moz’s Data Science Team Works.” Which is pretty weird, actually—I think that’s very strange, because this was just posted on our Dev Blog, which isn’t on our main site. It’s a subdomain, and it doesn’t rank very well. If you search and you’re not logged in, you won’t find it in the first 100 results at all. It’s showing up here because it’s been shared by an account that I follow. It’ll say, “Moz shared this.” And that’s happening because of the Google+ integration.


You might say, “Okay, that’s moderately interesting.” I can search for very broad things, too, like “industry survey,” and get—yes, the S&P Industry Survey of the Americas, the Standard & Poors—but then I get “Take the 2013 Moz Industry Survey.” Whoa! Suddenly Moz is ranking all over the place. Again, this is happening because Jonathon Colman, Dharmesh Shah, Pete Meyers, and one other person I follow on Google+ +1′d it. Google+ biasing again.


And there’s more. I tried some queries for “happy Halloween.” Happy Halloween—think how broad a search query that is. There was a post by Gianluca that he had shared today with a photo, and that showed up in my results. Consumer purchasing power—a Google+ post by Avinash Kaushik showed up because it was shared and I follow him. Patrick Stewart! Patrick Stewart, I mean it’s a celebrity query that gets millions of searches a month (well, probably hundreds of thousands because Star Trek TNG hasn’t been on for a while, but in our hearts it’s always been on). A post by George Takei, right? I follow George Takei on Google+ so a post from him about Patrick Stewart is in there (it was a delightful post, by the way).


What this means for marketers, particularly SEOs who are using search and social and content together in their marketing, is the audience on Google+ is becoming more and more valuable to us. These are search-savvy, tech-savvy folks who are potentially reachable, and reachable without the classic kinds of ranking signals. I don’t have to do one tenth of the work that I had to do to rank for these types of queries before. All I have to do is get you to follow me on Google+.


Even if these people aren’t using Google+ as a social network—even if they’re not visiting plus.google.com, and they’re not sharing things and following people and +1′ing—it doesn’t matter, because they’re still being biased so long as they follow your account. So long as you’re encircled by those individuals, it’s valuable. And by the way, this is not just happening to people who have set up Google+ and are actually following you. It happens to anyone who is logged into a Google account, and has connected with you over email. Meaning, they’ve exchanged one or a few emails back and forth—it can’t just be you spamming them, it’s got to be that you’re actually receiving email from them as well.


Gmail is another way to get this same sort of bias. You can see it in there if you’re logged into your Gmail account, and you can see “Hey, I’m not following this person on Google+. Oh, we’ve exchanged emails, so they’re showing me these results higher that they’ve +1′d.”


Google+ sharing obviously is critical because of these influential factors, to SEOs in particular. But, be very careful, because think about this—if I shared every single page that I wanted to rank on just so that anyone who followed me on Google+ would be biased to seeing it? I would soon lose subscribers. In fact, I’m sure I would lose them very fast. People would be like, “What the hell is Rand doing filling up my stream? None of these have +1s.” It wouldn’t surprise me at all if Google is using some indication of metrics around usage to actually determine, “Hey, wait a minute, this is getting no +1s, no shares, no comments; why would I show this to anybody? I’m pushing it down in the results. I’m not going to show it.”


These are all things that did receive quite a lot of activity. Well, actually, Gianluca’s post hadn’t received any activity yet, but it was very recent and lots of his posts do receive activity. So, if you overshare, you have to be careful—I like to say I think discretion is key here. Also, even if you don’t have a Google+ audience, it doesn’t matter because influencers—people who do have audiences on Google+—might be sharing your stuff.


That’s fascinating to imagine. It’s almost like “Hey, I don’t use Twitter, but if I can just get someone to tweet some of this stuff for me, I know I’ll get traffic.” Well, on Google+, it’s not just the traffic you’ll get—you’ll also get high rankings from all of their audience. It’s really remarkable.


By the way—one thing of warning. There is a time decay on this stuff. I don’t see all of the posts that George Takei has historically made (historically, I can barely say “historically” with these teeth)—that he’s historically made about Patrick Stewart, I only see the ones from just recently. So, there’s a time decay factor, it looks like between a week and a month, depending on which accounts you’re following and what types of queries you’re doing—at least that’s what I’m seeing in my accounts. Being aware of that time decay means that if there’s a topic that’s very valuable, and you know you have a potential social audience to reach that’s either following you on Google+ or connecting with you through email, that might mean that publishing on a regular basis—I might say “Hey, if ranking for consumer purchasing power is really important to me, maybe I want to put up a blog post every month or two about consumer purchasing power.”


What’s crazy is you don’t need exact keyword matching. The post about Patrick Stewart here did not have exact keyword matching, so this is a very broad algorithm that’s currently biasing to show these Google+ results. This is an incredibly powerful tool for search marketers and social marketers, and I think it’s something that is going to get a lot more attention in the year to come.


With that, everyone, happy Halloween!


Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!



via Moz Blog http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MozBlog/~3/1FauTYC-5dw/using-google-plus-to-appear-in-the-top-results-every-time-whiteboard-friday


http://seocompanyadvice.com/using-google-to-appear-in-the-top-results-every-time-whiteboard-friday/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=using-google-to-appear-in-the-top-results-every-time-whiteboard-friday